Friday, October 30, 2009

Is The Credit Card Debt Elimination Legally Ethically Correct?

Many of us are probably wondering is the credit card debt elimination legally ethically is correct. The answer to this question, of course, will depend on the personal point of view. However, in most cases people will believe that the credit card debt elimination legally ethically is correct. There are several reasons why people believe that credit card debt elimination is legally ethically correct. One of these reasons is the fact the credit card companies are already compensating for the risk of non-payment of the creditors by charging them higher interest rates. There are other reasons why credit card debt elimination is legally ethically correct.

One of these reasons is the fact that if a settlement is negotiated between the creditor and debtor, both parties benefit from it. The mutual benefit is what makes the credit card debt elimination legally ethically correct. The creditor returns a large part of the money and the debtor save part of the money. Both sides are happy and that reinforces the view that credit card debt elimination legally ethically is correct. However, this applies on to the settlement cases. Simple non-payment case may be viewed as the opposite � being a credit card debt elimination legally ethically incorrect.

Credit card debt elimination is legally ethically correct if this is a consolidation case. If the debtor decides to use the help of the outside credit management company, this remains a case where credit card debt elimination legally ethically is correct. This is because the case is done through the mutual negotiation and agreement of both sides, thus being beneficial for both sides. Such activities as the negotiation of lower interest rate and lower monthly payments also fall under this category and still remain the case where credit card debt elimination legally ethically is correct.

No comments:

Post a Comment